viewerbta.blogg.se

Both browsers were left with their factory configuration. The testing machine was an Intel Core i5-3470 CPU 3.20GHz with 12GB RAM on Windows 8.1 Pro.

We put Cyberfox 35 to the test against 32-bit Firefox 35 to evaluate JavaScript performance, startup time and memory usage.

What's more, you can customize Cyberfox to suit your preferences, and thus, boost your productivity by handpicking the exact items to keep in the menu and toolbar while excluding the rest. You can start a new private session in an incognito window, view browsing history, enter full screen mode, enhance the app's functionality with plugins, create bookmarks, use web developer tools, as well as sign in with an account to sync tabs, bookmarks, passwords and settings. You can also ask the tool to clear fast restart cache on browser restart, as well as easily send the current link via email by opening the right-click menu.ĭue to the fact that the program uses the open-source code made by the Mozilla Firefox creators, the interface and most features are taken from Firefox, and they share the same structure. Other features of Cyberfox allow you to turn off various menu items, such as cleaning RAM cache, cloning tabs, copying the tab URL, accessing the about:config area, along with using the hello chat. In this new edition, it is possible to enable or disable the new-tab page, preload new-tab, search bar on new-tab, along with the thumbnail capturing on the new-tab page, specify the new-tab page, as well as deactivate the automatic loading of images and the Flash Player protection mode. This time we're only evaluating Cyberfox compared to Firefox. We're taking a look at it and redoing the previously described tests to find out if the app is getting closer to Firefox's level. For example, it implemented an option for closing all tab URLs with a single click. Yesterday, Cyberfox received a major update that brought new features to the table, along with improvements regarding performance and security. New features and different ones from Firefox Last year, we provided you with a comparison review between Firefox 20.0.1, Pale Moon 24.5, Waterfox 28 and Cyberfox 20.0.1 to see which one is better in terms of JavaScript performance, startup time and memory usage, and we came to the conclusion that 32-bit Firefox probably remains the best choice for 64-bit Windows. However, users can resort to browsers built by other developers that focus on this aspect. Mozilla Firefox has yet to release an optimized edition of the famous web browser for 64-bit Windows.